1966 Buick Electra vs. 2000 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2000 Ford Econoline is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,572 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2000 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Econoline weights approximately 295 kg more than 1966 Buick Electra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Buick Electra | 2000 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Electra | Econoline |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6572 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3510 mm |