1966 Buick Electra vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,572 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Buick Electra (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (247 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Buick Electra weights approximately 470 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Buick Electra | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Electra | BLS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6572 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2680 mm |