1966 Buick Electra vs. 2010 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2010 Ford Taurus is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,572 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Taurus (365 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Buick Electra. (275 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1966 Buick Electra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Buick Electra weights approximately 49 kg more than 2010 Ford Taurus.
Because 2010 Ford Taurus is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Buick Electra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Taurus will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Buick Electra | 2010 Ford Taurus | |
| Make | Buick | Ford |
| Model | Electra | Taurus |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6572 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 365 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 2030 kg | 1981 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5154 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2868 mm |
