1966 Buick Electra vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Buick Electra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Buick Electra would be higher. At 6,572 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Buick Electra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Buick Electra (275 HP) has 165 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Buick Electra should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 1966 Buick Electra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Buick Electra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1966 Buick Electra has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1966 Buick Electra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Buick Electra | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Buick | Holden |
| Model | Electra | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6572 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2685 mm |
