1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 1966 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1947 Talbot T 26. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1947 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 445 kg more than 1947 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1947 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | DeVille | T 26 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3130 mm |