1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1959 Holden FE
To start off, 1966 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1959 Holden FE. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1959 Holden FE | |
Make | Cadillac | Holden |
Model | DeVille | FE |
Year Released | 1966 | 1959 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |