1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1966 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 324 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
| Model | DeVille | Continental |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 7043 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2328 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2000 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 90 L |
