1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. (180 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | DeVille | 280 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 180 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
