1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1981 Seat 131
To start off, 1981 Seat 131 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1981 Seat 131. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1981 Seat 131 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | DeVille | 131 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |
