1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo
To start off, 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher.
Because 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1982 Lamborghini Marco Polo | |
Make | Cadillac | Lamborghini |
Model | DeVille | Marco Polo |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1310 mm |