1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190
To start off, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 (235 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 685 kg more than 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190.
Because 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1990 Mercedes-Benz 190 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | DeVille | 190 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |