1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1996 Seat Toledo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 225 more horse power than 1996 Seat Toledo. (63 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Toledo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 972 kg more than 1996 Seat Toledo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | DeVille | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2480 mm |
