1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1997 Fiat Duna
To start off, 1997 Fiat Duna is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1997 Fiat Duna. (86 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1997 Fiat Duna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1119 kg more than 1997 Fiat Duna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Fiat Duna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1997 Fiat Duna | |
| Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
| Model | DeVille | Duna |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1581 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2370 mm |
