1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1997 Xedos 6
To start off, 1997 Xedos 6 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1997 Xedos 6. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1997 Xedos 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 864 kg more than 1997 Xedos 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Xedos 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 1997 Xedos 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Xedos |
| Model | DeVille | 6 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 288 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
