1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Lotus Extreme
To start off, 2000 Lotus Extreme is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Extreme. (120 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Extreme. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1539 kg more than 2000 Lotus Extreme. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lotus Extreme is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Lotus Extreme. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Lotus Extreme | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | DeVille | Extreme |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 700 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2420 mm |