1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 2000 Marcos Mantis is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Marcos Mantis (506 HP) has 298 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2000 Marcos Mantis is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Marcos Mantis. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Cadillac | Marcos |
Model | DeVille | Mantis |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 506 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2290 mm |