1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 494 kg more than 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | DeVille | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |