1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2000 Proton 400 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2000 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2000 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2000 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Proton |
| Model | DeVille | 400 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2510 mm |
