1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2002 Mazda 2
To start off, 2002 Mazda 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2002 Mazda 2. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 844 kg more than 2002 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2002 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | DeVille | 2 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 1399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |