1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL

To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL (603 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 395 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL weights approximately 110 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Cadillac DeVille 2003 Mercedes-Benz CL
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model DeVille CL
Year Released 1966 2003
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 5980 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 12 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 208 HP 603 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2045 kg 2155 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 5000 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2860 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 88 L