1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 363 kg more than 2003 Toyota Condor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | DeVille | Condor |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 2438 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 1632 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |