1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 GMC Safari
To start off, 2004 GMC Safari is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2004 GMC Safari. (191 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Safari. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 232 kg more than 2004 GMC Safari. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 GMC Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 GMC Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 GMC Safari | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | DeVille | Safari |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 4294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 191 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1793 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 102 L |