1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2004 Tata E
To start off, 2004 Tata E is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2004 Tata E. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2004 Tata E. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 675 kg more than 2004 Tata E. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2004 Tata E | |
Make | Cadillac | Tata |
Model | DeVille | E |
Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2810 mm |