1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Kia Shuma II
To start off, 2005 Kia Shuma II is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP) has 107 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 87 kg more than 2005 Kia Shuma II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Kia Shuma II | |
Make | Cadillac | Kia |
Model | DeVille | Shuma II |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1593 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1958 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |