1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 154 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2005 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | DeVille | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1891 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 100 L |