1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 BMW 320

To start off, 2009 BMW 320 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2009 BMW 320. (168 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 BMW 320. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 430 kg more than 2009 BMW 320. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Cadillac DeVille 2009 BMW 320
Make Cadillac BMW
Model DeVille 320
Year Released 1966 2009
Body Type Convertible Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 7029 cc 2171 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2045 kg 1615 kg
Vehicle Length 5700 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 3300 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 82 L 63 L