1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 205 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | DeVille | Tahoe |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7028 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 320 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 2200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 98 L |