1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 632 kg more than 2009 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | DeVille | Compass |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 172 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 1393 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 51 L |