1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | C70 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |