1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 BMW X6
To start off, 2010 BMW X6 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X6 (304 HP @ 440 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X6 weights approximately 181 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 BMW X6 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | DeVille | X6 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 440 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1983 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 85 L |