1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (360 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2010 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | DeVille | 300 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 360 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4999 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1882 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1483 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3048 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 72 L |
