1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 493 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | DeVille | 5 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1552 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1753 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 60 L |
