1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-250 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2012 Ford F-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | F-250 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 132 L |