1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 523 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Land Rover LR4 | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | DeVille | LR4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7027 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2025 kg | 2548 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1915 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1882 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2885 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 86 L |