1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC90. (240 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 151 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | XC90 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1897 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 80 L |