1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 BMW X5
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 (296 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 BMW X5 | |
Make | Cadillac | BMW |
Model | DeVille | X5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 2985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4857 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2197 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 85 L |