1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 136 kg more than 2013 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2013 Cadillac CTS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
Model | DeVille | CTS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1868 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1842 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 68 L |