1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Ford Flex
To start off, 2013 Ford Flex is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,954 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2013 Ford Flex. (281 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford Flex. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Flex weights approximately 24 kg more than 1966 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 1966 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Ford Flex | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | DeVille | Flex |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6954 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 288 HP | 281 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2256 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2994 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 70 L |