1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2013 Kia RIO. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia RIO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 866 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | Cadillac | Kia |
| Model | DeVille | RIO |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7028 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 136 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1995 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4045 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 43 L |
