1966 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 117 kg more than 2013 Volvo X670.
Because 2013 Volvo X670 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac DeVille | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | DeVille | X670 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2045 kg | 1928 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2815 mm |
