1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1966 Cadillac Sixty is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 149 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | Sixty | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1966 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2040 mm |