1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1973 DAF 66
To start off, 1973 DAF 66 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (46 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1287 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1973 DAF 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | Sixty | 66 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 46 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 828 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2270 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 42 L |
