1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200
To start off, 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. (95 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 770 kg more than 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1976 Mercedes-Benz 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Sixty | 200 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 65 L |