1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1979 Daihatsu Charade
To start off, 1979 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 157 more horse power than 1979 Daihatsu Charade. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1979 Daihatsu Charade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1430 kg more than 1979 Daihatsu Charade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1979 Daihatsu Charade | |
| Make | Cadillac | Daihatsu |
| Model | Sixty | Charade |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 51 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2330 mm |
