1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1982 Plymouth Reliant
To start off, 1982 Plymouth Reliant is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 965 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Reliant.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Plymouth Reliant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1982 Plymouth Reliant | |
Make | Cadillac | Plymouth |
Model | Sixty | Reliant |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2260 mm |