1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1983 Fiat Regata
To start off, 1983 Fiat Regata is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Regata. (81 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Regata. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1983 Fiat Regata. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Regata, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1983 Fiat Regata | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | Sixty | Regata |
Year Released | 1966 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 50 L |