1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1992 Chevrolet Lumina
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina (210 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1966 Cadillac Sixty. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 574 kg more than 1992 Chevrolet Lumina.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1992 Chevrolet Lumina | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Sixty | Lumina |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7029 cc | 3350 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1541 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2740 mm |
