1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1995 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1995 Ford Ranger is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1995 Ford Ranger. (118 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 720 kg more than 1995 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1995 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | Sixty | Ranger |
Year Released | 1966 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2507 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2840 mm |