1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | Sixty | TL |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2840 mm |