1966 Cadillac Sixty vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1996 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 1996 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac Sixty weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1996 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Cadillac Sixty is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Cadillac Sixty. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Cadillac Sixty | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Rover |
Model | Sixty | 200 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7029 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2115 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3390 mm | 2510 mm |